“Too much freedom destroys itself” ?
A friend of mine raised the question about censorship on his blog some time ago reminding that in Germany it is forbidden by law to negate the holocaust, while in the U.S. the right for free speech and free opinion is not limited whatever the issue may be. I am a German of the second generation after the war, my parents grew up in the after-war period and as such this issue touches me.
It is true: A censorship does not protect us from dangerous ideas that can easily keep on growing in hidden places. It even has negative effects: Marked as forbidden those ideas get even more interesting, especially for young guys on their way to shock society. Growing in hidden parts of the society they get even more dangerous and harder to control. They don’t get negotiated in society and are out of the state’s control. In Germany we already had cases in which it got unclear how much undercover agents working in the underground Nazi groups got already entangled with the environment they were working in.
In Germany since ever it is our biggest problem that we have to fight with ourselves when it comes to the NS-issue. I will explain you how that is:
Most people have the feeling they cannot express what they really think in their mind. A common feeling for example is expressed in a sentence like this: “Unfortunately as Germans we are not allowed to criticize israelian politics because otherwise they will tell us immediately that we made a Nazi argument.” So they feel forced to keep down their opinion and keep it down and keep it down and keep it down… until in the end – probably by a public and also intelligent person that actually is not of this political corner – there comes out a sentence like: “ …but Sharon is another Hitler.” And you just wonder how that comes… because you should expect a better control from people of public life.
I think this is our “uncanny”, that are the unexpressed and suppressed parts that come up then with even more energy and maybe often worse than they were originally.
On the other hand I never ever experienced it that someone was really criticizing israelian politics in matter of facts and got blamed for it, neither in public life nor in private. You can talk about the special prisons for Palestinians or the restricted free speech of journalists. But this of course asks for a bit more effort, you need to be informed about what is really going on. Besides the fact that sentences like the ones above are not based on historic facts, they evoke a – also often wanted – scandal and so they do not contribute to a discussion about the content itself but about ourselfes. Like this we lose our ability to talk about a political issue.
For many people this just means: Better not talk about it.
And there grows a bad feeling, a feeling of: we are the punished while other people and other nations also did bad things but they can talk freely about it and what can I do about it, I am just born here and did not do it myself/ I am just a not so intelligent, not political person… Like this the feeling of being restricted by the left wing’s politics grows.
All these feelings of being humiliated (as if today us Germans were the biggest victims of the war) just help the right-winged parts growing.
These difficulties in talking explain actually a lot of things in Germany: Discussions like “Isn’t it great that we finally can show around proudly again our flag now that we have the football world championships in our country?” (while I think: just do it but why discuss about it?) have their origin in this. In politics we missed to discuss about the multicultural situation that we have in Germany since a long time because of the fear that looking critically at different cultures could come out as racism.
It seems clear: What we really need is not a censorship that represses people but a society that is awake and sensible for the subtle tones of racism.
But let us be honest and realistic: How often do we see big parts of this society fail? How often do we see ourselves fail? How often does it happen that no one raises his voice when it should be there?
To me there are some good reasons for a censorship: It is a sign that there are borders of things that can be said, borders in the name of freedom. There is a clear possibility for juridical consequences for who might not acknowledge these borders. It is an official statement from our state towards foreign states and towards Israel (with which we have in common that this belongs to our history that marks us – in a bad and I always hope also in a good way).
And last but not least: Freedom is a weak good. Often we forget how to appreciate it and would feel its value more during a lack of freedom. As a defender of freedom often I feel in a weak position because I would avoid to use some of the tactics that uses the opposition. In situations in which maybe I have to be the (first) lonely one who has to rise the voice it feels good to me to know that there is a law behind me, to know that I live in a state in which the position towards holocaust and so also towards anti-Semitism and racism is clear, at least in what is written down. And I know: If there is one voice, there are probably more, but if already one starts hesitating…
If (every)one starts hesitating we come to situations that give the answer to this question about how it could happen what happened in Europe 70 years ago.